Clash of the XF Wide Angle Lenses

DSCF0364a
When there is a new lens that is pretty close in the focal range

to an old lens, what do we do; let’s have a battle of the lenses.

Many Fujifilm X-series user will certainly have XF10-24mm F4
in their line-up. This is for obvious reason; it’s the widest lens
Fujifilm has to offer until now.
DSCF0073

@8mm F9 1/2000 Lite with Broncolor Siros. X-T3.

DSCF0334

@8mm F5.6 X-T3

DSCF0213

@8mm F22 1/20 X-T3

DSCF0250a

I decided to have a comparison because I own the XF10-24mm
since it’s launch. Is there is need to upgrade for 2mm more? If I
am shooting landscape; one could just take a few steps backward
and you kinda have almost the same wide-angle as XF8-16mm.
XF10-24mm is a very versatile lens. Great for landscape and
urbanscape. At 24mm I could do some amazing street photography
too. What is there not to love about XF10-24mm. It’s probably the
top 3 lenses in term of sales for Fujifilm.
Here are the basic differences
XF8-16mm F2.8 WR  vs  XF10-24mm F4
USD$1999.95                  /  USD$990.00
Image stabilization     No /  Yes
Motor type            Linear /  Stepper Motor
Weight                  805g   /  410g
Diameter              88mm /   78mm
Length                122mm /   87mm
WR                        Yes    /   No
Zoom method Extending /  Internal
Minimum focus    0.25m  /  0.24m
In a nutshell, it’s twice the weight as XF10-24mm.
It’s double the price for one F-stop advantage.
It’s a WR but doesn’t house IS which we all
can’t live without.
If I am looking for the wide-angle zoom; I believe
XF8-16mm F2.8 with be an obvious choice. Like many,
if I own a XF10-24mm; will you be tempted to upgrade?
Here are a few reason I could think of. Interior photography.
There certainly will be a time you needed that extra
one step back to nail that shot. This is very real and I
have experienced this in my commercial work scope.
So that 2mm wider field is important.
The next reason is simple; F2.8. It may be only one
stop but if you like night and astronomy photography
this means much. Not that XF10-24mm produces poor
IQ. The F2.8 glass inside the  XF8-16mm is certainly
a notch up. Almost zero distortion and vignetting.
DSCF0118

@8mm F22 1/60 X-T3

DSCF0246

@8mm F5.6

DSCF0344

@16mm F2.8 pretty nice bokeh for a wide angle lens.

DSCF0323

@8mm F2.8 1/750 X-T3

DSCF0364

@8mm F2.8

DSCF0358

@16mm F2.8. And it could go pretty close too.

DSCF0186

@8mm F22 1/15 X-T3

DSCF0103

@8mm F6.4

As much as it’s great for landscape photography, I wonder
How does one attached a filter in the front? If someone have
a solution; do kindly share.
IQ. Without a doubt it certainly a notch up from XF10-24mm.
Sharper for sure. At wide open it perform very well. Sharp
to the edge when compare with XF10-24mm.
As we know getting our perspective right is important in wide
angle; yet sometime we should let out hair lose and take
advantage of distortion. Right? As for distortion it’s almost
zero for me. As long as your alignment is correct you are good
to go.
As for comparison; there is nothing to compare. They are
different. So, will I get this lens? The answer is obvious for me.
The headache is should I sell my XF10-24mm? What do you
think?
Instagram : https://www.instagram.com/ivanjoshualoh/
FB : https://www.facebook.com/IvanjoshualohX/?ref=bookmarks
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s